Scripture and canon
which writings bind—closed list, open debate, oral scaffolding holding the letters
Scripture names texts ascribed special status; canon names the cut—what counts and why—often stabilized slowly through councils, curriculum, memorization chains, and political power. Protestants classically distinguished sola scriptura from Catholic and Orthodox webs of tradition; Jewish communities balance Written and Oral Torah; Islam centers Qur’anic recitation while hadith corpora complicate the picture; Hindu “scripture” sprawls across śruti and smṛti without one Protestant-style closure.
Conceptually, canon raises hermeneutics: literal, allegorical, legal, mystical; and raises authority: who may interpret, who is corrected, who speaks in God’s idiom.
Outdeus treats scripture-canon as an authority-and-meaning concept—where communities negotiate permanence and change without pretending texts are read raw.
- Figures
- Augustine of Hippo ·Moses Maimonides ·Abu Hāmid al-Ghazālī ·Thomas Aquinas ·Karen Armstrong
- Traditions
- Judaism ·Christianity ·Islam ·Hinduism
- Related
- Religious authority ·Revelation ·Myth as truth ·Prophecy ·Divine command
Essays · 10 in total
- From Chan to Zen: Buddhism’s Chinese and Japanese Transformations
- The Essenes and the Dead Sea Scrolls: Voices from the Judean Desert
- Gnosticism: Secret Knowledge or Heresy?
- Jehovah's Witnesses: Kingdom, End Times, and Separation from the World
- Modern Islamic Thought: Reform, Revival, and Response to a Changing World
- Mormonism and the American Restoration: Scripture, Christology, and a Plan of Salvation
- The Reformation: Luther, Calvin, and the Break from Rome
- Religious Authority: Who Decides What Is True?
- Revelation: Divine Communication and Human Interpretation
- The Talmud: Judaism's Living Conversation